View Full Version : Which router for VLANS
slipstream_242
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
I want to setup vlan routing for a test lab at home and found that none of
the routers I have at the moment support encapsulation on the Ethernet port.
I suspect this is because they are Ethernet and not fast Ethernet?
Anyone out there who can make a suggestion to which router would be best but
I`m not after the all singing all dancing variety as I`m on a tight budget
Thanks
Gordon
Lars Christensen
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
"slipstream_242" <gordon_williams@ntlworld.com> wrote in
news:B%VKc.651$66.372@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net:
> I want to setup vlan routing for a test lab at home and found that
> none of the routers I have at the moment support encapsulation on the
> Ethernet port. I suspect this is because they are Ethernet and not
> fast Ethernet?
>
> Anyone out there who can make a suggestion to which router would be
> best but I`m not after the all singing all dancing variety as I`m on a
> tight budget
>
> Thanks
>
> Gordon
>
>
Hey Gordon
Have you tried to use subinterfaces, like ethernet0.1?
Cheers Lars
stephen
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
"slipstream_242" <gordon_williams@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:B%VKc.651$66.372@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
> I want to setup vlan routing for a test lab at home and found that none of
> the routers I have at the moment support encapsulation on the Ethernet
port.
> I suspect this is because they are Ethernet and not fast Ethernet?
>
> Anyone out there who can make a suggestion to which router would be best
but
> I`m not after the all singing all dancing variety as I`m on a tight budget
cheapest one i know of is the 1721 (for 802.1q rather than ISL). Note it
only seems to work on the built in 10/100 port - the 4 port switch module
doesnt like 802.1q.
depending on the s/w verson, you may need IOS plus
>
> Thanks
>
> Gordon
--
Regards
Stephen Hope - return address needs fewer xxs
slipstream_242
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
Yes, I have configured sub interfaces but doesn't allow me to specify ISL or
Dot1q. I think the contributory factor is that the Ethernet port is not fast
Ethernet?
If I try to configure sub interfaces it tells me that they can only be
configured if they are part of an ISL or Dot1q protocol which is being used
but the protocol is not available on the Ethernet port.
"Lars Christensen" <lars@sjgnksjdf_perseus.dk> wrote in message
news:Xns952BD98C71DDlsngfkodk@62.243.74.162...
> "slipstream_242" <gordon_williams@ntlworld.com> wrote in
> news:B%VKc.651$66.372@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net:
>
> > I want to setup vlan routing for a test lab at home and found that
> > none of the routers I have at the moment support encapsulation on the
> > Ethernet port. I suspect this is because they are Ethernet and not
> > fast Ethernet?
> >
> > Anyone out there who can make a suggestion to which router would be
> > best but I`m not after the all singing all dancing variety as I`m on a
> > tight budget
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gordon
> >
> >
>
> Hey Gordon
>
> Have you tried to use subinterfaces, like ethernet0.1?
>
> Cheers Lars
Walter Roberson
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
In article <QfYKc.1963$li3.288@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>,
slipstream_242 <gordon_williams@ntlworld.com> wrote:
:Yes, I have configured sub interfaces but doesn't allow me to specify ISL or
:Dot1q. I think the contributory factor is that the Ethernet port is not fast
:Ethernet?
Contributory, but not absolute limitation. *Some* of the Cisco routers
allow you to do 802.1Q on 10 Mb, if you have the appropriate hardware/
software combination. Not just on "10/100" boards, either: I mean on
boards that are strictly 10 Mb.
Looking through the list quickly, it appears that you need something
in the 12.2(8)* series as a minimum, that support is available even
in the IP feature set, and the 1700 series looks to be about the smallest
device it would work on.
--
And the wind keeps blowing the angel / Backwards into the future /
And this wind, this wind / Is called / Progress.
-- Laurie Anderson
slipstream_242
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
ok, Thanks. I have ISO 12.2(5)D so I guess I shall need to look for the
later version?
The routers I have at the moment are the 2610 and a couple of 2503s.
"Walter Roberson" <roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> wrote in message
news:cdhgfm$srv$1@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca...
> In article <QfYKc.1963$li3.288@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>,
> slipstream_242 <gordon_williams@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> :Yes, I have configured sub interfaces but doesn't allow me to specify ISL
or
> :Dot1q. I think the contributory factor is that the Ethernet port is not
fast
> :Ethernet?
>
> Contributory, but not absolute limitation. *Some* of the Cisco routers
> allow you to do 802.1Q on 10 Mb, if you have the appropriate hardware/
> software combination. Not just on "10/100" boards, either: I mean on
> boards that are strictly 10 Mb.
>
> Looking through the list quickly, it appears that you need something
> in the 12.2(8)* series as a minimum, that support is available even
> in the IP feature set, and the 1700 series looks to be about the smallest
> device it would work on.
> --
> And the wind keeps blowing the angel / Backwards into the future /
> And this wind, this wind / Is called / Progress.
> -- Laurie Anderson
M.C. van den Bovenkamp
07-25-2004, 02:48 AM
slipstream_242 wrote:
> ok, Thanks. I have ISO 12.2(5)D so I guess I shall need to look for the
> later version?
>
> The routers I have at the moment are the 2610 and a couple of 2503s.
Forget the 2503s. The 2610 will do 802.1Q as of IOS 12.2(15)T9 (ED
release), 12.2(24a) (GD release) IP Plus feature set.
Look at http://www.cisco.com/go/fn (the Feature Navigator) for things
like this. Needs a CCO login, but no special access.
Regards,
Marco.
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.